Build better products with our product team.
To pull data from Employee Experience Insights table/view directly through an API to PowerBI for the purpose of creating a custom dashboard.
Hello! I would like to put in a request for the following in EXI:In the “Employee Issues” dashboard, you can download CSV files of the tickets that are categorized in each of the 24 tiles on the employee issues heat map. The extremely beneficial information from these CSV files is the Topics column (that are determined via AI by reading the short description of the help desk ticket). The topics allow us to easily extract the main issues people are having/submitting help desk tickets for, and thus allow us to pinpoint the top issues. The biggest downfall is that we need to manually download all 24 CSV files and combine into one file, which is time consuming. THE REQUEST: Add the ability to download a CSV file with all tickets that contain the Topic column (and the category type e.g., “Troubleshoot Information”; the same information that can currently be downloaded now for each of the tiles on the heat map). BUG: In the “Apps and Services Detail” dashboard, you can download one CSV file for all tickets, but there the information in the “Topic” column and TTR when you download the file is wrong. If this is fixed, this may solve the issue, but it would be ideal to be able to include the ability to download a file of all tickets within the given timeframe on both the “Employee Issues” and and “Apps and Services” Detail dashboards that includes a column with the topics.
Our customer, WellStar, is requesting a capability to compare incidents (config items) year to year. I see that we are able to pull data from one specific quarter or year... but are there any plans to offer a timeframe comparison? Wellstar wants to be able to compare year to year or quarter to quarter. I imagine this would also benefit other customers as well.
As an admin, I would love if I were able to do additional things within Knowledge Studio. Such as:Enabling an admin to mark a suggestion as completed, not applicable, notes, etc. so we don’t have to try and remember which ones we have already worked. See history of items we have marked completed, etc. so that we can look at the history of what has been taken care of. More of an interactive “To-Do” view or “Task” oriented view would be helpful when filtering what suggestions we are able to actually turn into KBAs, and what suggestions are not applicable.Thank you for all you do!
ChallengeMoveworks ingests and surfaces archived Confluence spaces/pages because archived items remain reachable via deep links. This leads to stale content appearing in bot results and requires manual removal of spaces from ingestion whenever they are archived.Product IdeaEnable an option to automatically exclude archived Confluence spaces and pages from ingestion.Key points:Use Confluence’s existing status = "archived" metadata. Ignore spaces/pages marked as archived. Optional toggle in the connector: “Exclude archived content.” Prevents stale results and removes manual cleanup. Proposed EnhancementImplement logic in the Confluence connector to:Detect status = "archived" on spaces using the Confluence REST API (e.g., /api/v2/spaces/{id}). Exclude pages belonging to archived spaces from ingestion. Optionally detect archived pages (those with the /pages/archived URL pattern or other metadata) and exclude them individually. Provide a toggle in the Moveworks Integrations UI: “Exclude archived spaces” “Exclude archived pages” Ensure Moveworks search results return only current knowledge matching what users see in Confluence. Note: I’ve already raised a support ticket and the team have confirmed this is currently not possible. Only workaround is to adjust Space Keys URL to add “Archive” to them then apply a DSL filter which is not ideal. e.g. NOT (("archive" IN article.article_url.$LOWERCASE()))
Platform to build a wide range of more tailored, task specific AI assistants. Examples include sales account prospecting, customer support, and chief of staff assistants.
OverviewCurrently, when a user takes action on an approval directly in ServiceNow, there is still an outstanding notification that exists in the Moveworks bot.With the recent acquisition of Moveworks by ServiceNow, we would like to propose full bi-directional synchronization of notifications between ServiceNow and MoveWorks bots. Proposed FunctionalityWith this enhancement, any approval actions taken directly in ServiceNow would also update the Moveworks bot notification and mark it as read or completed. As we are beginning to transition our primary Moveworks platform to the new AI Assistant on the Web platform, it would create less friction among the user community, if these actions could somehow be synced so that only notifications marked as Unread shown in the AI Assistant platform were notifications that had no action taken yet on either platform. Hopefully, with the recent acquisition of Moveworks by ServiceNow, this is something that could be added to the synergy roadmap between the two systems.
Hi,We are exploring the potential Operating Model for Creator Studio. We came to an idea of opening to all but we have concern on the access because anyone with developer access can see all use cases and can push the button to production. So is there a plan to have something likeOnly the Creator Studio Admin can see all use cases in the company. Creator Studio Use Case can only be seen by the one developed it or if he share it to his co developer. Only the creator studio Admin will have the right to publish the use case in to Production.Thanks
Formally submitting product request on behalf of The Wonderful Company: After a user is prompted to re-authorize 3rd party access, ideal experience would be for AI Assistant to automatically re-trigger the initial plugin request. As seen in below screenshot, user experience is not straightforward to know to type ‘retry’ to re-trigger the approve timecard plugin: Additional details of request here:
Can we have interactive buttons available again for Agent Studio?Previously, this feature was only supported in Classic Studio, which is being phased out soon. We’ve been developing several use cases that rely on active user input, and the lack of buttons is creating friction in the experience.More teams are requesting approval workflows through our chatbot. While the interactive button options can be done natively with ServiceNow, it won’t be possible for other API-based use cases, which could make the experience inconsistent and confusing for end users.Additionally, many of the plugins showcased in the AI Agent Marketplace display buttons as part of their interface. Does this indicate there’s already a roadmap for bringing this functionality back to Agent Studio?
Lets discuss some limitations we’ve encountered over the years with the employee comms/comms module, which we frequently use in our organization. Despite its utility, there are several basic features that seem to be missing:Ability to create numbered lists. Options to highlight or underline text. Flexibility to add spacing between text. Options for font size and formatting Capability to insert images anywhere in the message, not just at the bottom.These features are quite standard in comms tools, and their absence is noticeable. Our organization loves sending messages via our bot, but we often have to explain these limitations. I'm curious if there are specific reasons these features haven't been implemented over the years, or if there are any plans for improvements?
I am thinking few feature for moveworks web app. I am totally imagining how our IThelp page will be replaced with moveworks web app.section for announcements , employee comms, section for promoted answers by the users Quick links Gallery ( Auto populated) Perform Source Choose from ( Company Data, Search web) if both enabled results tabs for each Tasks (Approvals, call to action) Alerts ( Critical ) available Skill or agent list, so trigger and directly use them tagging users on how bot helped them ( helps for adoptation)
Within my organization, my team consistently receives requests for Edison metrics - Particularly, organizations are interested to know the % of their team members are leveraging AI to assist them with daily tasks. The filtering options that are currently available on the Analytics application do not easily allow for a user to filter down to a select organization - For example, our Core HR team wanted to understand their utilization of the AI Assistant and the organization of 1K individuals were made up of over 200 departments that had to manually be added into the analytics app. My recommendations for the analytics application are:Allow Moveworks customers to add additional fields, from ServiceNow in my case, to filter on within the Analytics Application If fields such as cost center or supervisory org could be included this would elevate the pain point of only being able to use the smaller department field Allow Moveworks customers to upload a csv of email addresses to filter on the user interactions the team is interested in I envision this capability would work similar to the employees comms capability to upload a csv to determine the target audience - this enhancement would allow users to upload a csv to determine the scope for looking into interaction metrics Allow Moveworks customers to easily view when the bot proactively sends Agent Studio messages Currently we can only view the user interactions, we had to create a ServiceNow table that tracks when our bot sends messages, however it would be convenient to be able to track the messages sent, in the same place as the interactions are I understand the Data API could potentially elevate these pain points and allow our organization to gain more value from the metrics being captured in the analytics application. However, I believe adding these enhancements would benefit all Moveworks customers, particularly those with small teams with limited resources and those who have not implemented the Data API.One example I would like to share is we are working an effort to correlate a potential decrease in the number of HR cases opened by new hires, and user engagement with the ‘Welcome to NG’ Edison nudges we deployed in August of last year. We are tracking the nudges that are sent via ServiceNow table, which does not capture if the user interacted with the message or not. 3,257 users who have received 14K+ ‘Welcome to NG’ notifications since the launch of this effort - I have submitted a request to our Customer Success team to see if they can pull a report of the 3K user interactions so we can manually review and see if they did/did not interact with the nudges. From the Moveworks perspective, instead of customers having to make these type of requests, the enhancements mentioned will empower self service by Moveworks customers and allow for them to easily capture the metrics they are interested in.
Currently, all integrations need to flow through REST APIs. For databases that do not expose REST APIs, the only way to access the data is to build a custom web service layer that exposes a REST API to then query the data. This is a very large and expensive lift. It would be much easier to have a JDBC type connector that can connect and interact with databases directly, without the need for a REST API.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK