Build better products with our product team.
Build your own ticketing integration using Agent Studio Actions. The resulting integration can take advantage of all Service Management SKU capabilities (Interception, EXI, Triage 2.0, etc)
Permissioned HTML content (Articles & catalog items) and Permissioned File Attachments (DOC, PPT, & PDF)
Enables users to search for data from Slack in Enterprise Search
Ability to execute LDAP commands from Agent Studio plugins.
Enables users to search for millions of documents from Zendesk in Enterprise Search
Challenge• When Moveworks sends a ticket nudge (“Is this still an issue?”), users often reply yes with no context.• Analysts then lack actionable detail and must ask further questions, creating unnecessary back‑and‑forth.• The platform currently does not support enforcing or encouraging a structured explanation when a user indicates the issue persists. Proposed EnhancementAdd an optional “Reason Required” mode to the ticket‑nudge workflow.When a user selects “Yes, it’s still an issue”, Moveworks prompts the user with a structured follow‑up question such as:• “What’s not working? Please be specific.”• “What changed or what are you seeing now?”• “Add any new symptoms, screenshots, or error messages.”This could be implemented via:• A configurable follow‑up template in Moveworks.• A conditional “required field” before the bot updates the ticket state.• A lightweight form or message collector to capture context.Value• Reduces the ping‑pong between bot → user → analyst.• Improves ticket quality and accelerates resolution.• Ensures Moveworks captures meaningful data at the point of user friction.• Increases analyst trust in bot‑driven follow‑ups.Note: I’ve discussed this with the Moveworks Support team, they advised this functionality is not possible yet and to raise a feature request hence this request.
What it doesAutomatically flags any Confluence page where Moveworks fails to ingest permissions correctly.This helps us catch silent RBAC issues before users hit them.Why it mattersEnsures RBAC accuracy before and after go‑live Detects when Moveworks can’t read page permissions Prevents pages from being incorrectly blocked or incorrectly served Reduces manual spot‑checking across thousands of pagesWhen it should alertA page shows “Permission crawled: false” Moveworks finds 0 permissions where Confluence has permissions Access Lookup denies a user who does have access in Confluence A previously healthy page suddenly stops ingesting permissionsWhat the alert containsPage title + URL Current permission state Serving status When the ingestion last succeeded Optional: recommended next action (e.g., “re-crawl page”, “review connector logs”)Value to MoveworksSimple, low-noise signal that highlights ingestion gaps Helps customers maintain confidence in RBAC integrity Reduces support tickets for intermittent permission issues Aligns with how customers already monitor connector health I’ve discussed with Moveworks Support team already, there is nothing in place to capture this currently so they advised to raise this as an alert idea.
One of the challenges as a Moveworks Admin and Dev is sharing with the users what prompts they have access to. There is no easy way to export all of them (even via the Support route) and keeping prompts up to date in a document or KB article requires manual effort.Microsoft has taken steps to resolve this issue for users with their Prompt Gallery. As of July, Microsoft will be building the Prompt gallery into the Copilot chat for even easier access.Changes to the Copilot Prompt Gallery app - Microsoft SupportFor best user experience, I would love to see Moveworks implement a solution like this in the AI Assistant as well. https://copilot.cloud.microsoft/en-US/prompts/all?ocid=CopilotLab_M365Chatofficeweb
Would be helpful to have an SDA on/off toggle on each plugin as we’ve noticed that it calls on some plugins that we don’t want it to run on.
I want to be able to manage what text is displayed during the “Thinking” step of my AI Assistant.Currently, the name of all the plugins being used are showing up on the screen. In some cases, these plugin names can be shown on the screen as 5 or 6 different lines, which can be noisy and look very robotic.We’d like to have the ability to update the language used while the user waits for a response, or at the very least limit the visibility to 1 or 2 lines on the screen for all plugins.
Vision:Enable full native rendering and interaction with ServiceNow forms—including Client Scripts, UI Policies, Catalog Client Scripts, and UI Actions—directly within the Moveworks Web AI Assistant. This would allow users to complete forms without leaving the assistant, creating a seamless self-service experience.Why Now?With ServiceNow acquiring Moveworks, there's a unique opportunity to align platform capabilities. Moveworks may now have the technical control to support JavaScript execution safely within its Web AI Assistant, and ServiceNow can provide the necessary form logic and rendering components.💼 Business Value PropositionFrictionless User Experience: Users can complete complex forms directly in the Web AI Assistant, reducing drop-off and confusion. Increased Adoption: More users will engage with self-service workflows when forms are accessible and functional. Platform Synergy: Leverages the shared ownership between ServiceNow and Moveworks to deliver deeper, native integration. Reduced Support Load: Fewer tickets and manual interventions as users resolve issues independently via intelligent forms.
Great to see that MCP servers are on the roadmap. Would love to see Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) support being added too. It’s Open Source https://google.github.io/A2A/#/ Idea: Integrate the Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol to enable Moveworks' AI agents to seamlessly collaborate with other AI agents across various enterprise platforms. Key Features:Inter-Agent Communication: Allow Moveworks' AI agents to communicate and collaborate with other agents from different vendors. Capability Discovery: Use the "Agent Card" feature to identify and leverage the best-suited agents for specific tasks. Task Management: Support efficient task management with real-time feedback and notifications. Modality Agnostic Support: Extend support for various modalities, including text, audio, and video. Enhanced User Experience: Provide a unified interface for users to interact with multiple agents seamlessly.Benefits:Increased productivity Cost efficiency Innovation through seamless agent collaboration
To pull data from Employee Experience Insights table/view directly through an API to PowerBI for the purpose of creating a custom dashboard.
Hello! I would like to put in a request for the following in EXI:In the “Employee Issues” dashboard, you can download CSV files of the tickets that are categorized in each of the 24 tiles on the employee issues heat map. The extremely beneficial information from these CSV files is the Topics column (that are determined via AI by reading the short description of the help desk ticket). The topics allow us to easily extract the main issues people are having/submitting help desk tickets for, and thus allow us to pinpoint the top issues. The biggest downfall is that we need to manually download all 24 CSV files and combine into one file, which is time consuming. THE REQUEST: Add the ability to download a CSV file with all tickets that contain the Topic column (and the category type e.g., “Troubleshoot Information”; the same information that can currently be downloaded now for each of the tiles on the heat map). BUG: In the “Apps and Services Detail” dashboard, you can download one CSV file for all tickets, but there the information in the “Topic” column and TTR when you download the file is wrong. If this is fixed, this may solve the issue, but it would be ideal to be able to include the ability to download a file of all tickets within the given timeframe on both the “Employee Issues” and and “Apps and Services” Detail dashboards that includes a column with the topics.
Our customer, WellStar, is requesting a capability to compare incidents (config items) year to year. I see that we are able to pull data from one specific quarter or year... but are there any plans to offer a timeframe comparison? Wellstar wants to be able to compare year to year or quarter to quarter. I imagine this would also benefit other customers as well.
As an admin, I would love if I were able to do additional things within Knowledge Studio. Such as:Enabling an admin to mark a suggestion as completed, not applicable, notes, etc. so we don’t have to try and remember which ones we have already worked. See history of items we have marked completed, etc. so that we can look at the history of what has been taken care of. More of an interactive “To-Do” view or “Task” oriented view would be helpful when filtering what suggestions we are able to actually turn into KBAs, and what suggestions are not applicable.Thank you for all you do!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK