Build better products with our product team.
Problem StatementAt CVS Health, conflicting information across multiple sources is a recurring challenge. Often, newer content exists alongside outdated versions on older sites, leading to confusion and incorrect answers. Current reasoning systems do not adequately account for content freshness, as published dates are not factored into relevancy scoring.Proposed SolutionIntroduce a product upgrade that integrates date-awareness into content relevancy algorithms. This enhancement would allow the system to prioritize and rank information based on temporal attributes, ensuring that the most current and authoritative content surfaces first.Key FeaturesMulti-Date Consideration: Incorporate created, updated, and published date (or a weighted combination) into relevancy scoring. Dynamic Ranking: Adjust search and reasoning outputs to favor the most recent and accurate content. Configurable Rules: Enable administrators to define how date attributes influence ranking (e.g., prioritize updated date over published date). Conflict Resolution: Automatically flag and deprioritize outdated or superseded content to reduce misinformation.
Current Issue: Senior Leader with direct reports asks MW bot a question about his/her level using a query like “Am I manager”. MW bot responds with “No, you’re not” while in reality that person is of course a manager. Expected behavior” Since bot doesn't know level of that person, as user’s role details are not mapped -bot should respond with “I don’t have that information”.It is ultimately a bad user experience when bot serves incorrect information. Support says this current behavior is expected as bot not having manager information assumes that user is not a manager.
Currently, even when a user has admin access in My Moveworks, they are unable to send Employee Communications without completing additional configuration steps.To send employee communications, users must manually configure the following: Navigate to Moveworks Setup → Notification Setup → Additional Controls Enable permissions for the Employee Communication feature This process adds unnecessary complexity for admins who already have access to both environments.We request an enhancement to automatically enable Employee Communication permissions for users with the Employee Communications (E-Comms) role, eliminating the need for additional manual configuration.Expected: Users with the Employee Communications (E-Comms) role can send communications without additional setup. The system automatically grants necessary permissions under “Notification Setup → Additional Controls.”
Hello,In our ITSM our bot will receive instructions or utterances to close a ticket. As an agent we do not see the conversation leading to this decision, only the end result of our bot closing the ticket with a message stating “User Name said: Ok to close the ticket”. This could also be determined by utterances spoken and we’d like those interactions with our bot sent as a transcript to the ticket. This information can let our agents know if a ticket was closed due to lack of knowledge, our bot’s ability or even frustrations with the interactions. This will allow us to bring better resolutions to our users for future interactions.
Allow users to toggle Dark Mode on and off.
Attachment field types are unsupported for ingested forms for Jira. It would be great to have attachments be an option for field types as we have users submit screenshots and PDFs of various types when creating tickets.
Hi,For comms messages sent using the bot, would it be possible to add a new button type?Our idea is to have a button that users can press to ask a pre-populated question. When the user clicks this button, a message will be sent to the bot as though the user typed it. The bot will then respond.The idea behind this came from our new-starter comms. When a new starter joins, we send them a bespoke message using the bot. To encourage engagement, we had the idea of including a few pre-populated questions in this message, that the new starter could select. This would start a conversation without the user having to type anything in.Thanks
To better support our Client’s audit requirements, I am looking for the ability to remove the chat history from the interface (Slack, Teams, Web) after certain duration for a targeted group. Example: our frontline users would only see their interactions within the bot from the last 24 hours. We would still want all the conversation data available in Analytics.
Vision:Enable full native rendering and interaction with ServiceNow forms—including Client Scripts, UI Policies, Catalog Client Scripts, and UI Actions—directly within the Moveworks Web AI Assistant. This would allow users to complete forms without leaving the assistant, creating a seamless self-service experience.Why Now?With ServiceNow acquiring Moveworks, there's a unique opportunity to align platform capabilities. Moveworks may now have the technical control to support JavaScript execution safely within its Web AI Assistant, and ServiceNow can provide the necessary form logic and rendering components.💼 Business Value PropositionFrictionless User Experience: Users can complete complex forms directly in the Web AI Assistant, reducing drop-off and confusion. Increased Adoption: More users will engage with self-service workflows when forms are accessible and functional. Platform Synergy: Leverages the shared ownership between ServiceNow and Moveworks to deliver deeper, native integration. Reduced Support Load: Fewer tickets and manual interventions as users resolve issues independently via intelligent forms.
The new data ingestion status page is fantastic. To diagnose potential issues, could there be a way to download the raw log data for diagnosis? If we get this info, it may assist with diagnosing if the issue is on the customer side or Moveworks side. If we can see it is with the customer side, would could go out, correct those issues and then see if the next ingestion run takes that corrected document. For example, if a PDF does not get ingested, raw logs might point out that an unsupported font was found, or that the document only contained embedded pictures instead of text so it was ignored. With the logs we could better adapt any issues to the ingestion for the bot I have attached a screenshot of where I could envision the download button per ingestion run would go to really narrow down where potential issues may occur
CVS Health has a need to our assistant to reply with explicit answers that we define rather than doing or including a knowledge search in its response. This feature was previously available with paths but with the new agent studio and agentic paths, a knowledge search is also being conducted. This is impactful as there are some situations where we find very outdated knowledge. The team needs time to clean it up and as a stop gap we need to publish the correct answer. Since Moveworks doesn’t take publish date into consideration, old outdated content is still sometimes used. In summary, we need a simple, scalable way to provide scripted answers to colleagues without leveraging the copilot knowledge search feature.
I saw in the Copilot feature overview that the unsubscribe etc are no longer possible in Copilot. For us this is a really important feature as it helps retain the users that have a lot of tickets open because they act as kind of a superuser for other people and open tickets for them. They get overwhelmed with notifications and like to mute some of them but would without that feature mute the bot entirely. Which would lower our active users significantly.Please bring that useful feature back, I don’t understand why it was not considered.
An information field in the software provisioning configuration page, most likely following the Additional Questions section, that allows us to provide request-specific context for the request to an approving manager who may not be very familiar with the software. This would be information the approver needs to know when determining whether the request should be approved or denied. This information might include licensing/subscription costs, the purpose of the app, whether the request involves access to sensitive information, etc.Currently there’s only a field to prompt the requester for answers. Some of this information can be shoe-horned into those question fields, but that provides a poor user experience. The end user should not see these messages.If the provisioning strategy is role-based, there should be a separate such field for each configured role.
Can we have interactive buttons available again for Agent Studio?Previously, this feature was only supported in Classic Studio, which is being phased out soon. We’ve been developing several use cases that rely on active user input, and the lack of buttons is creating friction in the experience.More teams are requesting approval workflows through our chatbot. While the interactive button options can be done natively with ServiceNow, it won’t be possible for other API-based use cases, which could make the experience inconsistent and confusing for end users.Additionally, many of the plugins showcased in the AI Agent Marketplace display buttons as part of their interface. Does this indicate there’s already a roadmap for bringing this functionality back to Agent Studio?
It would be beneficial to have the ability to @ our bot in conversations. For example I am conversing with a co-worker and they ask a question. I could @moveworks (insert bot name) to provide the answer in our conversation. Similar to what Grok does on X.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK